V. Methods of Proctoring
a. In-person Proctoring
In-person proctoring involves a human proctor overseeing an assessment to maintain exam integrity. It allows for immediate intervention if a student is caught cheating and enables physical demonstrations in fields like medicine. Best practices for in-person proctoring include selecting a disturbance-free venue and arranging seating to minimize opportunities for cheating.
BASIC Information
In-person proctoring, as the name suggests, involves an actual human presence overseeing an assessment. Imagine a classroom setting where students are seated in rows, papers or computers in front of them, and an instructor or designated proctor walks around, ensuring everyone follows exam rules. This method is a traditional approach to maintain exam integrity.
Watching students as they answer written questions about medical knowledge.
Observing students during practical examinations where they might be demonstrating a procedure on a mannequin or even interacting with actual patients in controlled settings.
INTERMEDIATE Information
Advantages:
Immediate Intervention: If a student is caught cheating or breaking rules, the proctor can take immediate action.
Physical Demonstration: Especially relevant for medical fields, where students may need to demonstrate skills hands-on.
Environment Control: Proctors can ensure that the environment is conducive for the exam, minimizing disturbances.
Direct Assistance: If there's an ambiguous question or a student requires clarification, proctors can assist on the spot.
Logistical Concerns: Scheduling, arranging suitable venues, and ensuring every student can attend can be complex.
Limited Scalability: Larger groups of students may need multiple proctors or sessions, complicating coordination.
Accessibility Issues: Not all students might find the proctored location accessible, especially those with physical disabilities.
Pressure: Some students might find the presence of a proctor stressful, potentially affecting their performance.
ADVANCED Information
Setting the Scene:
Venue Selection: Choose a location free from disturbances. For medical students, ensure tools/equipment are easily accessible.
Seating Arrangement: Position students so they have adequate space, minimizing chances of unintentional glancing or cheating.
Proctors should be familiar with the subject matter, especially if they need to clarify queries.
They should also be trained in handling situations of misconduct, ensuring they react appropriately without escalating tensions.
Always have provisions for students with disabilities. Whether it's a ramp for wheelchair users or providing additional time for those with learning difficulties.
Feedback Loop:
Post-exam, gather feedback from both students and proctors. This will help in refining the proctoring process for future assessments.
Ethical Considerations:
Respect student privacy and rights. While the goal is to prevent cheating, it shouldn't come at the cost of a student's dignity or well-being.
For PA programs, especially during patient interactions, ensuring patient consent and comfort is vital. Proctors should be trained to observe without interfering in the student-patient interaction, unless absolutely necessary.